A rant has been posted on Travelmole against travellers concerned about the environmental impact of their trips. The author, Jeremy Skidmore, has form for this kind of contrarian outburst – and he can say whatever he likes, of course – but it is a little worrying that a widely read industry website such as Travelmole should choose to post such comment pieces without at least balancing things up a little with alternative viewpoints. It says a lot to me about just how far the industry has yet got to go before “getting” this whole subject, let alone starting to tackle it. Here’s a little taster…
If, like me, you will not give a second thought about the impact on the environment of your holiday, you are not alone. Despite all the hype to the contrary, a new survey has shown that two thirds of Britons do not care about their carbon footprint. Indeed, people aspire to long haul holidays to relax from their stressed lives and worry most about their accommodation not living up to scratch or that their luggage will go missing. I recycle and use energy saving light bulbs (and would advise everyone to do so), but I’m certainly not going to stop flying to all parts of the world on business and pleasure. Most people feel the same way, partly because we’re selfish and partly because we are unconvinced about the impact of aviation on the environment, or indeed ‘climate change’ in general…

2 comments
Comments feed for this article
July 23, 2007 at 8:27 am
Graham McKenzie
Leo, one of the reasons we allow Mr Skidmore and others the freedom to ‘rant’ is to provoke comment and discussion about issues of this nature. The site allows instant comment and as of this moment 16 have been made – mainly ‘anti skid’. I did not notice one from you?
The site has a whole and we as a company have a more than sympathetic view with regard to responsibilty and sustainability in travel and tourism as our .TV coverage and popular Vison publication will testify.
I believe we more than ‘balace’ view points when expressed and more importantly allow the readers to do this themselves.
July 23, 2007 at 9:15 am
Leo Hickman
Hi Graham,
Thanks for taking the time to respond. I have no issue whatever with you commissioning comment pieces like this – why would I? – I just wish there were more comment pieces commissioned from alternative viewpoints, that’s all. I’m just concerned that it gives the impression to readers that this is Travelmole’s prevailing attitude if you don’t mix things up a little. This is worrying to me as your website clearly has significant influence within your industry. I’m pleased that the Skidmore article has provoked a largely negative reaction from your readers, but I don’t think it is enough of a defence to say that just because readers can leave their comments it’s OK to keep commissioning from one side of the debate. I may, of course, be doing you a great disservice by having not noticed other comment pieces of late from the other side of the fence, but I can’t recall one. (I must stress this isn’t a comment about your news coverage over all – I’m pleased you have a ‘Sustainable Travel’ section on the site, for example – just with the balance of comment pieces.)